As promised, here is part 2 of our discussion of responding to violence in light of the Boston Bombings. The first part didn't seem adequate and raised questions that both of us continued to think on. We decided to address some of those questions in a second podcast. It's not enough to say "forgive" in the face of sustained violence--we must find a way to respond that limits future violence without simply escalating force and violence. If our only response to violence is escalating use of force and power, we do not address the problem. However, we have to go deep to change this perspective. Our response to violence is grounded in a number of stories about individuality, community, morality, freedom and God. Our final question is does God merely do security theater as some contend? This week, we try to explore some of those issues a little further.
Responding to Violence: Security, Responsibility and the Nation-State in Light of the Boston Bombings, Part 2
In the future, we are aiming for Monday releases so we have time to prep the recordings over the weekend. Sorry about the late podcast this week, but Muskwatch is hard at work revising his thesis after a successful defense. Next week, we'll be back with The Truth About Stories, Part II.
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Responding to Violence: Security, Responsibility and the Nation-State in Light of the Boston Bombings, Part 2
Labels:
authority
,
Boston bombing
,
Frames of War
,
Great Controversy
,
Judith Butler
,
love
,
narrative
,
nation-state
,
Precarious Life
,
religion
,
responsibility
,
salvation
,
security
,
security theater
,
stories
,
vulnerability
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
No comments :
Post a Comment